The angle marked $$78^\circ$$ is a central angle subtended by arc MK.
Therefore, arc MK = $$78^\circ$$.
The angle $$x$$ is an inscribed angle subtended by arc NK.
To find $$x$$, we first need to find the measure of arc NK.
The angle $$\angle KMN$$ is an inscribed angle. We need to know what arc KN subtends. However, we don't have enough information to determine arc NK directly from the given diagram.
Let's assume $$x$$ is the inscribed angle subtending arc OK. This is not correct. $$x$$ is an angle at the center O.
The diagram shows $$x$$ as an angle at the center O, adjacent to the $$78^\circ$$ angle, and together they form $$\angle MON$$. This interpretation is incorrect as $$x$$ is shown as an angle within triangle KMN.
Let's re-examine the diagram. The angle marked $$x$$ is an inscribed angle subtended by arc NK.
The angle marked $$78^\circ$$ is $$\angle MOK$$. This is a central angle, so arc MK = $$78^\circ$$.
We need to find arc NK. We are given that $$\angle KMN$$ is an inscribed angle. It subtends arc KN.
There is no direct relation given for x with the 78 degree angle. Let's assume $$x$$ is part of the angle $$\angle MON$$. This is not indicated.
Let's assume $$x$$ is an inscribed angle subtended by arc NK. We need to find arc NK.
If we assume that the line segment MK is a chord, and KMN is an inscribed triangle.
The angle $$x$$ is marked as part of the central angle $$\angle MON$$. Let's consider $$\angle MOK = 78^\circ$$. This means arc MK $$= 78^\circ$$.
If $$x$$ is the inscribed angle subtending arc KN, we cannot determine it without more information.
Let's reconsider the labels. If $$78^\circ$$ is $$\angle MKO$$, and $$x$$ is $$\angle MOK$$, then in triangle MOK, $$OM=OK$$ (radii), so it's isosceles. Then $$\angle OMK = \angle OKM = 78^\circ$$. Sum of angles in triangle = $$180^\circ$$. $$\angle MOK = 180 - (78+78) = 180 - 156 = 24^\circ$$. So $$x=24^\circ$$. This interpretation is unlikely given the placement of $$x$$.
Let's assume $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle MOK$$. So arc MK $$= 78^\circ$$.
The angle $$x$$ is indicated as an inscribed angle subtended by arc NK.
There is no direct way to calculate arc NK from the given information.
Let's assume that the diagram intends for $$x$$ to be a part of the central angle $$\angle MON$$.
If $$78^\circ$$ is $$\angle MON$$, then arc MN = $$78^\circ$$. And $$x$$ is a part of it.
Let's assume $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle MOK$$. So arc MK = $$78^\circ$$.
Let's assume $$x$$ is the inscribed angle $$\angle MNK$$. This subtends arc MK. So $$x = 78/2 = 39^\circ$$. This is also unlikely due to the position of $$x$$.
Let's assume $$x$$ is the inscribed angle $$\angle NKM$$. This subtends arc NM.
Let's assume $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle MON$$. So arc MN = $$78^\circ$$. $$x$$ is an inscribed angle that subtends arc NK.
If $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle KMN$$. This is not possible.
Let's assume $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle MOK$$. So arc MK = $$78^\circ$$.
Let's assume $$x$$ is the inscribed angle $$\angle MNK$$. Then $$x = 78/2 = 39^\circ$$.
Let's assume $$x$$ is the inscribed angle $$\angle NKM$$. It subtends arc NM.
Let's assume $$78^\circ$$ is the central angle $$\angle MON$$. So arc MN = $$78^\circ$$. $$x$$ is an inscribed angle.
Re-examining the image: $$78^\circ$$ is clearly labeled as $$\angle MOK$$. Thus, arc MK $$= 78^\circ$$.
The angle labeled $$x$$ is an inscribed angle $$\angle MNK$$. This angle subtends arc MK.