Why did Carstensz and Cook reach such different conclusions about Australia and its peoples? Use evidence from the text to support your view.

Carstensz and Cook likely formed different conclusions due to differing contexts, experiences, and objectives in their explorations of Australia. Carstensz, focusing on geographical features, might have emphasized the terrain and climate, while Cook, interacting with indigenous communities, could have highlighted cultural aspects. Without specific text, this is a general analysis based on historical contexts.