We are given a triangle △CDF and points E on CD and F on DF. We are also given that △CDE ≅ △CFE.
The problem statement seems to have a typo. Point F is a vertex of △CDF, so it cannot be on DF as a separate point. Assuming E is on CD and another point, let's call it G, is on DF, and we have CE and CG drawn. Or, perhaps E is on CD and some point H is on DF, and we are given △CEH ≅ △CFH.
Let's re-interpret based on the figure. The figure shows △CDF. Point E is on CD, and a line segment FE is drawn. The congruence given is △CDE ≅ △CFE. This means that triangle CDE (with vertices C, D, E) is congruent to triangle CFE (with vertices C, F, E).
Let's list the corresponding parts from the congruence △CDE ≅ △CFE:
We are given that in △CDF, CD = CF (from the congruence statement).
A triangle is defined as isosceles if it has at least two sides of equal length.
Since we have shown that CD = CF from the given congruence △CDE ≅ △CFE, the triangle △CDF has two equal sides (CD and CF).
Therefore, △CDF is an isosceles triangle.
Additionally, from the congruence, we have ∠CDE = ∠CFE. Since E lies on CD and F is a vertex, ∠CDE is actually ∠CDF, and ∠CFE is an angle within △CFE.
If we consider the angles of △CDF:
From the congruence, we know ∠CDE = ∠CFE. This implies ∠CDF = ∠CFE. However, ∠CFE is not necessarily equal to ∠CFD.
Let's focus on the side equality.
Given: △CDE ≅ △CFE.
From the congruence: CD = CF (corresponding sides).
Definition of isosceles triangle: A triangle with at least two sides of equal length.
Conclusion: Since CD = CF, △CDF is an isosceles triangle.